Stress Analysis of underground Piping

Basics for Stress Analysis of Underground Piping using Caesar II

Underground or buried piping are all piping which runs below grade. In every process industry there will be few lines (Sewer or drainage system, Sanitary and Storm Water lines, Fire water or drinking water lines etc), part of which normally runs underground. However the term buried piping or underground piping, in true sense, appears for pipeline industry as miles of long pipe run carrying fluids will be there.

Analyzing an underground pipe line is quite different from analyzing plant piping. Special problems are involved because of the unique characteristics of a pipeline, code requirements and techniques required in analysis. Elements of analysis include pipe movements, anchorage force, soil friction, lateral soil force and soil pipe interaction.

To appreciate pipe code requirements and visualize problems involved in pipe line stress analysis, it is necessary to first distinguish a pipe line from plant piping. Unique characteristics of a pipe line include:

  • High allowable stress: A pipe line has a rather simple shape. It is circular and very often runs several miles before making a turn. Therefore, the stresses calculated are all based on simple static equilibrium formulas which are very reliable. Since stresses produced are predictable, allowable stress used is considerable higher than that used in plant piping.
  • High yield strength pipe: To raise the allowable, the first obstacle is yield strength. Although a pipe line operating beyond yield strength may not create structural integrity problems, it may cause undesirable excessive deformation and possibility of strain follow up. Therefore, high test line with a very high yield to ultimate strength ratio is normally used in pipe line construction. Yield strength in some pipe can be as high as 80 percent of ultimate strength. All allowable stresses are based only on yield strength.
  • High pressure elongation: Movement of pipe line is normally due to expansion of a very long line at low temperature difference. Pressure elongation, negligible in plant piping, contributes much of the total movement and must be included in the analysis.
  • Soil- pipe interaction: The main portion of a pipe line is buried underground. Any pipe movement has to overcome soil force, which can be divided into two categories: Friction force created from sliding and pressure force resulting from pushing. The major task of pipe line analysis is to investigate soil- pipe interaction which has never been a subject in plant piping analysis.

Normally these lines does not have high design temperatures (of the order of 60 to 80 degree centigrade) and only thermal stress checking is sufficient for underground part. Common materials used for underground piping are Carbon Steel, Ductile iron, cast Iron, Stainless Steel and FRP/GRP.

In this article I will try to explain the steps followed while analysing such systems using Caesar II. However this article does not cover the basic theory for analysis.

Inputs Required for Analysis:

Before proceeding for analysis of buried piping using Caesar II collect the following information from related department
1. Isometric drawings or GA drawings of the pipeline from Piping layout Department.
2. Line parameters (Temperature, Pressure, Material, Fluid Density, etc) from process Department.
3. Soil Properties from Civil Department.

Caesar II for Underground Piping Analysis:

The CAESAR II underground pipe modeler is designed to simplify user input of buried pipe data. To achieve this objective the “Modeler” performs the following functions for analyst:

  • Allows the direct input of soil properties. The “Modeler” contains the equations for buried pipe stiffnesses that are outlined later in this report. These equations are used to calculate first the stiffnesses on a per length of pipe basis, and then generate the restraints that simulate the discrete buried pipe restraint.
  • Breaks down straight and curved lengths of pipe to locate soil restraints. CAESAR II uses a zone concept to break down straight and curved sections. Where transverse bearing is a concern (near bends, tees, and entry/exit points), soil restraints are located in close proximity and where axial load dominates, soil restraints are spaced far apart.
  • Allows the direct input of user-defined soil stiffnesses on a per length of pipe basis. Input parameters include axial, transverse, upward, and downward stiffnesses, as well as ultimate loads. Users can specify user-defined stiffnesses separately, or in conjunction with CAESAR II’s automatically generated soil stiffnesses.

Modeling steps followed in Caesar II: 

The modeling of buried piping is very easy if you have all the data at your hand. The following steps are followed for modeling:

  • From the isometric model the line in the same way as you follow in case of above ground pipe model i.e, enter line properties in Caesar Spreadsheet, enter lengths by breaking the line into several nodes or select an existing job for converting it into an underground model.
  • Analyst can start the Buried Pipe Modeler by selecting an existing job and then choosing Input-Underground from the CAESAR II Main Menu. The Modeler is designed to read a standard CAESAR II input data file that describes the basic layout of the piping system as if it was not buried. From this basic input CAESAR II creates a second input data file that contains the buried pipe model. This second input file typically contains a much larger number of elements and restraints than the first job. The first job that serves as the “pattern” is termed the original job. The second file that contains the element mesh refinement and the buried pipe restraints is termed the buried job. CAESAR II names the buried job by appending a “B” to the name of the original job.
  • When the Buried Pipe Modeler is initially started up, the following screen appears:
Buried Piping
Fig. 1: Sample Caesar II Spreadsheet for Buried Piping

This spreadsheet is used to enter the buried element descriptions for the job. The buried element description spreadsheet serves several functions:

  • Allows analyst to define which part of the piping system is buried. 
  • Allows analyst to define mesh spacing at specific element ends. 
  • Allows the input of user-defined soil stiffnesses.

From/ To node:-

Any element of pipe in CAESAR II can be define by two elements first is start point and second is end point. In buried pipe model, before conversion the From/ To nodes remains same as unburied model.

Soil model no. :-
This column is used to define which of the elements in the model are buried. A nonzero entry in this column implies that the associated element is buried. A 1 in this column implies that the analyst wishes to enter user defined stiffnesses, on a per length of pipe basis, at this point in the model. These stiffnesses must follow in column numbers 6 through 13. Any number greater than 1 in the soil model no. column points to a CAESAR II soil restraint model generated using the equations outlined later under Soil Models from analyst entered soil data.

From/ To mesh type:-
A critical part of the modeling of an underground piping system is the proper definition of Zone 1 bearing regions. These regions primarily occur:
• On either side of a change in direction
• For all pipes framing into an intersection
• At points where the pipe enters or leaves the soil
CAESAR II automatically puts a Zone 1 mesh gradient at each side of the pipe framing into an elbow. Note it is the analyst’s responsibility to tell CAESAR II where the other Zone 1 areas are located in the piping system.

User defined stiffness & ultimate load :-
There are 13 columns in the spreadsheet. Column 6 to 13 carry the user defined soil stiffnesses and ultimate loads if analyst defines soil model 1. Analyst has to enter lateral, axial, upward, downward stiffnesses & loads.

Procedure :-

  1. Select the original job and enter the buried pipe modeler. The original job must already exist, and will serve as the basis for the new buried pipe model. The original model should only contain the basic geometry of the piping system to be buried. The modeler will remove any existing restraints (in the buried portion). Add any underground restraints to the buried model. Rename the buried job if CAESAR II default name is not appropriate.
  2. Enter the soil data using Soil Models.
  3. Describe the sections of the piping system that are buried, and define any required fine mesh areas using the buried element data spreadsheet.
  4. Convert the original model into the buried model by the activation of option Convert Input. This step produces a detailed description of the conversion.
  5. Exit the Buried Pipe Modeler and return to the CAESAR II Main Menu. From here the analyst may perform the analysis of the buried pipe job.

The steps to create soil model and few other important considerations will be published in future posts on underground piping analysis.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

6 thoughts on “Basics for Stress Analysis of Underground Piping using Caesar II”

  1. Thanks for publishing this important article. I have a question.

    Sometimes we only have alignment sheets as the underground pipeline drawings. Can we prepare piping model with only alignment sheets?
    I hope your piping model will have a portion where undergorund pipeline will come out above the ground using a bend or S-bend. I am eagerly waiting to know how to handle this portion.

  2. Pipeline stress analysis I doing, buried model I completed. One problem will be there for buried model before of the two support is lifted. So how to solving this porsion.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Subscribe to the Piping Engineering CommunityAnd get instant notification on new articles publish, job updates, and much more!