• Home
  • About us
  • Piping Stress
    • Caesar II
    • Codes & Standards
    • Static Analysis
    • Piping Supports
    • Spring Hanger
  • Piping Design
    • Piping Layout
    • Piping Materials
  • Piping Jobs
  • Misc.
    • Civil
    • Instrumentation
    • process
    • Frequently Asked Interview Questions
    • Forum
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

What is Piping

An attempt to explain process piping engineering basics in detail to help all the process piping engineering professionals around the world.

Menu
  • Home
  • About us
  • Piping Stress
    • Caesar II
    • Codes & Standards
    • Static Analysis
    • Piping Supports
    • Spring Hanger
  • Piping Design
    • Piping Layout
    • Piping Materials
  • Piping Jobs
  • Misc.
    • Civil
    • Instrumentation
    • process
    • Frequently Asked Interview Questions
    • Forum
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
 › code › Flange › Flange leakage › leakage › Piping Layout › piping stress › piping stress analysis › stress analysis › Methods for checking flange leakage

Methods for checking flange leakage

want2learn January 14, 2018     13 Comments    

LinkedIn0
Facebook0
Google+2
Pinterest1
Twitter0
Introduction:
  • Leakage is a function of the relative stiffnesses of the flange, gasket and bolting.
  • Flanges are designed to remain leak free under hydrostatic test pressure when cold and under operating pressure when hot.
  • The design of flanges (ASME B 16.5) does not take into account the bending moment in the pipe. This generates wire drawing effect on the mating surface of the flange. Hence, additional flexibility is to be provided when a flange joint is located near a point of high bending moment. So, Leakage checking is required.
flange leakage
  • Process Piping Flanges are designed in accordance with BPV code, Section VIII, Division 1, appendix 2, using allowable stress and temperature limits of ASME B 31.3.
Analysis Criteria:
The criteria regarding when flange leakage checking is required should be mentioned in the ITB documents or project specs. But as a general practice the following can be used:
  • Flanges with rating 600 or more
  • Flanges with rating 300 and size greater than 24 inch
  • Pipe flanges carrying caterogy M fluid service
  • Pipe flanges carrying Hydrogen or other flammable fluid
  • PSV lines with NPS 6 inch or more
  • Flanges in Jacketed Piping
  • Flanges where stress engineer finds a very high bending moment
Analysis Methodology:
Two widely used methods are practiced in prevalent Process Industry. These are
  1. Pressure Equivalent method based on ASME B 16.5 pressure temperature table and
  2. ASME BPVC Sec VIII Div 1 Appendix 2 method.
Pressure Equivalent Method:
In this method the axial force (F) and bending moment (M) on the flange is converted into equivalent pressure (Pe) using following equations.
Equivalent Pressure for Axial force, Pe1=4F/ΠG^2
Equivalent Pressure for bending moment, Pe2=16M/ΠG^3
Here G=diameter at location of gasket load reaction =(Gasket OD+ID)/2 when bo<=6 mm
                                                                               =(Gasket OD-2b) when bo>6 mm.
Here bo=basic gasket seating width as given in table 2-5.2  of ASME sec VIII:
Now add these two equivalent pressures with pipe design pressure (Pd) to find total pressure (Pt=Pd+Pe1+Pe2) and enter into the ASME B 16.5 pressure temperature rating table associated with flange material. If Pt is less than the allowed pressure on the rating table corresponding to the associated temperature then flange will not leak.
ASME BPVC Sec VIII Div 1 Appendix 2 method:
In this method flange stresses (longitudinal hub stress, radial flange stress and tangential flange stress) are calculated based on code provided equations/formulas. These calculated stresses are then compared with allowable stresses as given in BPVC code Sec VIII Div 1 Appendix 2, Clause 2-8.
For calculating flange stresses one need to calculate the flange moment which is dependent on bolt load. Bolt load has to be calculated for two design conditions; operating & gasket seating, and the most severe will govern. For more details of the equations and calculation methodology the above mentioned code can be referred. Click on the following title if you are interested in Caesar II methods for flange leakage analysis using a) Pressure Equivalent Method and b) ASME Section VIII method

Related posts:

  1. Flange Leakage checking in Caesar II using ASME Section VIII method
  2. Methods for flange leakage checking by Pressure Equivalent Method using Caesar II
  3. Functions of Gaskets for leak proof Flanged joints
  4. Flange Leakage Evaluation based on NC 3658.3 Method method using Caesar II
  5. Stress Analysis of PSV connected Piping systems using Caesar II
  6. Major Stress related differences in Between 2012 edition and 2010 edition of ASME B 31.3
  7. Piping Stress Engineer with 6 years Experience is required for Dubai
code Flange Flange leakage leakage Piping Layout piping stress piping stress analysis stress analysis
boltingFlange LeakageGasketLeakagemethods of flange leakagepressure equivalent

 Previous Post

SALIENT DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR A PIPING SYSTEM THAT EMPLOYS AN EXPANSION BELLOW.

― January 13, 2018

Next Post 

Few points on “Selection of Bolts”

― January 15, 2018

Author: want2learn

Related Articles

NC 3658.3

want2learn ― March 20, 2018 | 10 Comments

Flange Leakage Evaluation based on NC 3658.3 Method method using Caesar II

This is the last post on the topic Flange Leakage Evaluation using Caesar II. I had already published 3 more

want2learn ― February 14, 2018 | 1 Comment

An article on: THE HAZARDS OF PRESSURE TESTING

want2learn ― February 4, 2018 | 7 Comments

Flange Leakage checking in Caesar II using ASME Section VIII method

want2learn ― December 24, 2017 | No Comment

An Article on HYDROSTATIC FIELD TEST of GRP / GRE lines

want2learn ― December 15, 2017 | 2 Comments

Guidelines on selection of various types of Flanges: A Literature

want2learn ― December 8, 2017 | 18 Comments

Pressure Tests of Piping systems-Hydrotest Vs Pneumatic Test

want2learn ― November 18, 2017 | 6 Comments

Methods for flange leakage checking by Pressure Equivalent Method using Caesar II

want2learn ― October 26, 2016 | 5 Comments

Functions of Gaskets for leak proof Flanged joints

13 Comments

  1. steve
    ― July 31, 2013 - 6:51 am  Reply

    Hey i must say that you have done a super work by sharing method for checking the flange leakage and if it is stainless steel flange bolts then after fixing forgot for years.

    dowel pins |clevis pins | DIN 7

  2. Anup Kumar Dey
    ― July 31, 2013 - 6:58 am  Reply

    Thank you very much…

  3. wsanabria
    ― March 8, 2014 - 1:30 pm  Reply

    Very good article. Congratulations.

  4. muthu
    ― March 28, 2014 - 8:03 pm  Reply

    Good , usefull basic one shd remember

  5. Jose B
    ― September 22, 2014 - 2:45 am  Reply

    Hi Anup, this website is pretty helpful for the stress engineer, i give you the thanks for sharing your Knowledge. I have a question, according to the Section VIII Div 1 Sec. 2. I have analyzed several flange studies and almost always I find out that the Bolting Stress is “Overstress” for flanges of 150#, specially those ones between 6″ & 20″.I have read on the COADE forums that this is a mistake on the Standard, because several flanges have been done and they didn’t have problems during it’s operational cycle. So I want to asked to you if you found out this too. And why this happens. Thanks.

    JAB

    1. want2learn
      ― September 22, 2014 - 10:38 pm  Reply

      Yes I also find the same results..In 90% of situations 150 rating flanges are failing in Caesar II…I asked Coade about the same..but they could not provide any satisfactory reply…

      1. Techwarrior
        ― November 18, 2016 - 10:46 am  Reply

        Hi,
        Just to add to your discussion, the standard flanges of ASME B16.5 have been taken from some old standards (i dont remember the exact one) which was based on practical testing rather than analysis.
        The analysis in ASME Sec VIII Div 1 was developed much later. Hence most of the standard flanges as per B16.5 do not pass in the analysis as per Div 1 App 2 but are still in use because they have been proved effective through practical use over the years.

  6. Amit Dewan
    ― July 24, 2015 - 3:53 pm  Reply

    Dear,

    I hope you are doing fine buddy, I would like to congratulate that way you are continuing sharing knowledge here.

    As a general remark, I would like to add to this discussion that usually we have 150# flanges in lines where pressures are low. However I have encountered the same problem.
    As a practice I’ve started to shift the flange connection i.e., break-up flanges/ valve assembly etc near to support location (if possible) in coordination with layout group. This hugely decreases the bending stresses at connections & design becomes safe.

    However, another solution is to switch the class from 150# to 300# at those points where Peq failure is more that 200-250%, as a general note, most PMS allows one rating higher flanges available.

  7. Kit
    ― February 25, 2016 - 5:17 pm  Reply

    Do I need to follow the client comment in running the flange leakage for 150# lines with temp. Of 50 deg C with Fuel oil product that does not fall on flammable fluid?

    1. want2learn
      ― February 25, 2016 - 9:00 pm  Reply

      Client requirements are the final requirements. So you have to perform leakage checking

  8. shd
    ― July 12, 2016 - 5:35 am  Reply

    Could you describe wire drawing effect specifically? I can understand overall theory, however i can’t understand what is wire drawing effect.

  9. Techwarrior
    ― November 18, 2016 - 10:39 am  Reply

    Hi all,
    Thank you for this nice article.
    I would like to add that under ASME Sec VIII Div 1 App2 method, in addition to calculation of induced stresses, flange rigidity check should also be done and checked if Flange rigidity <=1 for both operating & seating condition so that leak tightness is ensured.

    Even after all calculations are performed, the actual bolt tightening done on the flange also affects the joint integrity and leak tightness. For this ASME PCC-1 App O gives guidelines using joint component approach.
    Though it is not mandatory, it can also serve for ensuring leak tightness of the joint.

    Thanks.

  10. PIPINGONLINE
    ― April 25, 2017 - 4:00 pm  Reply

    interesting article!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Search this Website

Subscribe For Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Most Popular posts

  • Pressure Tests of Piping systems-Hydrotest Vs Pneumatic Test
  • 11 most important questions & answers from ASME B 31.3 which a Piping stress engineer must know
  • BASICS OF PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS: A PRESENTATION-Part 1 of 2
  • Piping Elbows and Bends: A useful detailed literature for piping engineers
  • Step by Step Methods for WRC 107 and WRC 297 Checking in Caesar II
  • BALL VALVE DESIGN FEATURES: A Literature-Part-3 of 4
  • A brief presentation on Air Cooled Heat Exchangers
  • Top 12 must have Piping books for a begineer into Piping industry
  • Stress Analysis of PSV connected Piping systems using Caesar II
  • Must have Load cases for stress analysis of a typical piping system using Caesar II

Previous Posts

Select Category of Interest

Sitemap

SiteMap