• Home
  • About us
  • Piping Stress
    • Caesar II
    • Codes & Standards
    • Static Analysis
    • Piping Supports
    • Spring Hanger
  • Piping Design
    • Piping Layout
    • Piping Materials
  • Piping Jobs
  • Misc.
    • Civil
    • Instrumentation
    • process
    • Frequently Asked Interview Questions
    • Forum
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

What is Piping

An attempt to explain process piping engineering basics in detail to help all the process piping engineering professionals around the world.

Menu
  • Home
  • About us
  • Piping Stress
    • Caesar II
    • Codes & Standards
    • Static Analysis
    • Piping Supports
    • Spring Hanger
  • Piping Design
    • Piping Layout
    • Piping Materials
  • Piping Jobs
  • Misc.
    • Civil
    • Instrumentation
    • process
    • Frequently Asked Interview Questions
    • Forum
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
 › ANSI B 31.3 › ASME B 31.3 › B 31.3 › Caesar II › Detail Design › Flexibility Analysis › Piping codes › Piping Layout › piping stress › piping stress analysis › static analysis › stress analysis › Uncategorized › Must have Load cases for stress analysis of a typical piping system using Caesar II

Must have Load cases for stress analysis of a typical piping system using Caesar II

want2learn December 25, 2017     27 Comments    

LinkedIn0
Facebook0
Google+0
Pinterest0
Twitter0

The main objectives of stress analysis is to ensure

A. Structural Integrity (Design adequacy for the pressure of the carrying fluid,Failure against various loading in the life cycle and Limiting stresses below code allowable.)

B. Operational Integrity (Limiting nozzle loads of the connected equipment within allowable values, Avoiding leakage at joints, Limiting sagging & displacement within allowable values.)

C. Optimal Design (Avoiding excessive flexibility and also high loads on supporting structures. Aim towards an optimal design for both piping and structure.)

To meet these objectives several load cases are required during stress analysis. This article will guide all the beginners with the methodology to build several load cases which will be required for stress analysis.

In this article we will use following notations for building load cases:

WW=water filled weight of piping system,

HP=Hydrotest Pressure,

W=weight of pipe including content and insulation,

P1=Internal Design pressure,

T1=Operating temperature,
T2=Maximum temperature,

T3= Minimum temperature,

WIN1, WIN2, WIN3 AND WIN4: wind loads acting in some specific direction,

U1, U2, U3 AND U4: uniform (seismic) loads acting in some specific direction.

While analysis at a minimum the stress check is required for the below mentioned cases:

a. Hydrotesting case: Pipelines are normally hydrotested before actual operation to ensure absence of leakage. Water is used as the testing medium. So during this situation pipe will be subjected to water weight and hydrotest pressure.
Accordingly our first load case in Caesar II will be as mentioned below

1.                    WW+HP                          HYD

b. Operating case: When operation starts working fluid will flow through the piping at a temperature and pressure. So accordingly our operating load cases will be as mentioned below:

2.            W+T1+P1                OPE                   for operating temperature case
3.            W+T2+P1                OPE                   for maximum system temperature case
4.            W+T3+P1                OPE                   for minimum system temperature case

c.  Sustained Case: Sustained loads will exist throughout the plant operation. Weight and pressure are known as sustained loads.  So our sustained load case will be as follows:

5.             W+P1                           SUS

d. Occasional Cases:  Piping may be subjected to occassional wind and seismic forces. So to check stresses in those situations we have to build the
following load cases:

6.                W+T1+P1+WIN1                       OPE                      Considering wind from +X direction
7.               W+T1+P1+WIN2                       OPE                      Considering wind from -X direction
8.                W+T1+P1+WIN3                      OPE                      Considering wind from +Z direction
9.                W+T1+P1+WIN4                       OPE                     Considering wind from -Z direction
10.              W+T1+P1+U1                            OPE                      Considering seismic from +X direction
11.              W+T1+P1-U1                              OPE                      Considering seismic from -X direction
12               W+T1+P1+U2                            OPE                      Considering seismic from +Z direction
13               W+T1+P1-U2                              OPE                      Considering seismic from -Z direction

While stress analysis the above load cases form load case 6 to load case 13 is generated only to check loads at node points.

To find occasional stresses we need to add pure occassional cases with sustained load and then compare with code allowable values. Following sets of  load cases are built for that purpose.
14.                 L6-L2                      OCC                         Pure wind from +X direction
15.                 L7-L2                      OCC                         Pure wind from -X direction
16.                 L8-L2                      OCC                         Pure wind from +Z direction
17.                 L9-L2                      OCC                         Pure wind from -Z direction
18.                 L10-L2                    OCC                        Pure seismic from +X direction
19.                 L11-L2                    OCC                         Pure seismic from -X direction
20.                L12-L2                    OCC                         Pure seismic from +Z direction
21.                 L13-L2                    OCC                         Pure seismic from -Z direction
22.                 L14+L5                  OCC                         Pure wind+Sustained
23.                 L15+L5                  OCC                         Pure wind+Sustained
24.                 L16+L5                  OCC                         Pure wind+Sustained
25.                 L17+L5                  OCC                         Pure wind+Sustained
26.                 L18+L5                  OCC                         Pure seismic+Sustained
27.                 L19+L5                  OCC                         Pure seismic+Sustained
28.                 L20+L5                  OCC                        Pure seismic+Sustained
29.                 L21+L5                   OCC                       Pure seismic+Sustained

Load cases from 22 to 29 will be used for checking occasional stresses with respect to code B 31.3 allowable (=1.33 times Sh value from code). Use scalar combination for load cases 22 to 29 above and algebraic combination for others as shown in figure attached below:

load cases

e. Expansion Case: Following load cases are required for checking expansion stress range as per code

30.                 L2-L5                     EXP
31.                  L3-L5                    EXP
32.                 L4-L5                     EXP
33.                 L3-L4                    EXP                            for complete stress range

The above load cases (from 30 to 33) are used to check expansion stress

The above mentioned load cases are minimum required load cases to analysis any stress system. Out of the above load cases the load cases mentioned in point number 1, 5, and 22-33 are used for stress check. And load cases mentioned in point number 1 to 13 are used for checking restraint forces, displacements and nozzle load checking.

Few additional load cases may be required for PSV connected systems, Rotary equipment connected systems.

Seismic and Wind analysis may not be required every time. So those load cases can be deleted if the piping system does not fall under the purview of seismic and wind analysis by project specification.  However to perform wind and seismic analysis proper related data must have to be entered in Caesar II spreadsheet (Will be discussed in my future posts).

If the stress system involves use of imposed displacements (D) and forces (F) then those have to be added with the above load cases in the form of D1, D2 or F1, F2 as applicable.

It is a better practice to keep

1. Hydro and sustained stresses below 60% of code allowable

2. Expansion and occasional stresses below 80% of code allowable

3. Sustained sagging below 10 mm for process lines and below 3 mm for steam, two phase and flare lines

4. Design/Maximum displacement below 75 mm for unit piping and below 200 mm in rack piping.

Related posts:

  1. Static Method of Seismic Analysis of Piping System using Caesar II
  2. Piping Stress Engineer required for Philadelphia (Experience: 5 yrs+)
  3. Piping Stress Engineer with 6 years Experience is required for Dubai
  4. BASICS OF PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS: A PRESENTATION-Part 1 of 2
  5. Static Method of Wind Analysis of Piping systems in Caesar II using Pressure Vs elevation Method
  6. BASICS OF PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS: A PRESENTATION-Part 2 of 2
  7. ASME B 31J & B 31J Essentials: Why these are useful in Piping Stress Analysis?
ANSI B 31.3 ASME B 31.3 B 31.3 Caesar II Detail Design Flexibility Analysis Piping codes Piping Layout piping stress piping stress analysis static analysis stress analysis Uncategorized
Caesar IIDetail DesignFlexibility Analysispiping detail analysisPiping Stress Analysis

 Previous Post

Details about control valves

― December 25, 2017

Next Post 

Applicability of Caesar II for stress analysis of lines having D/t ratio more than 100

― December 26, 2017

Author: want2learn

Related Articles

Contracting and Toroidal Measurement

want2learn ― April 4, 2018 | No Comment

An article on Conductivity Analyzers

What is conductivity? Conductivity is the ability of a material to transfer an electric charge from one point to another.

want2learn ― April 2, 2018 | No Comment

Added Features of CAESAR II 2018, Version 10.00

want2learn ― March 31, 2018 | No Comment

An article on Elevated Flare systems: Part 1 of 2

want2learn ― March 30, 2018 | 5 Comments

Points to consider while checking a stress system using Caesar II

want2learn ― March 29, 2018 | No Comment

An article on Produced Water Treatment: Part 2 of 2

want2learn ― March 27, 2018 | No Comment

AN OVERVIEW OF GAS TREATING

want2learn ― March 26, 2018 | 3 Comments

Stress Analysis of Centrifugal Compressor Connected Piping Systems using Caesar II: Part 1

want2learn ― March 25, 2018 | 1 Comment

An article on Produced Water Treatment: Part 1 of 2

27 Comments

  1. ddd
    ― December 18, 2013 - 8:21 am  Reply

    I couldn’t resist commenting. Exсeptionally well written!

  2. akash
    ― December 20, 2013 - 6:33 am  Reply

    I enjoу what you guуs tend to be up too. This sort of clever work and exposure!

    Keep up the fantastic works guys I’ve inсorpoгated you guys
    to my blogгoll.

  3. marque canada goose
    ― December 22, 2013 - 10:32 pm  Reply

    Howdy! Thіs post could not be written any better!
    Reading through this post remindѕ me of my ρrevious roommate!

    He сonstantly kept talking about this. I’ll send thіs information to him.

    Fairly certain he’s going to have a vеry good read.
    Thank уou for sharing!

  4. web site
    ― December 23, 2013 - 12:04 am  Reply

    I’ve been browsing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours.
    It’s pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all webmasters and
    bloggers made good content as you did, the web will be a lot more useful than ever before.

  5. Somnath
    ― March 13, 2014 - 11:22 am  Reply

    Very helpful article for beginers. thanks.

    Can you please throw light on Startup, shut down & upset load cases for Column piping analysis using CAESAR II.

  6. Mikey
    ― May 12, 2014 - 1:48 am  Reply

    Thanks for your article. What about externally imposed displacements from wind or seismic cases per B31.3 par. 319.2.1 (c)? Those displacements seem not to be typically considered. Not just with your example, but in pretty much every model that I’ve seen this code requirement is not followed. Why not? In your example, you omitted the requirement to do L2-L3 and L2-L4. Displacement and range cases all start from ambient. In reality, standby lines often become operational with thermal load and fluid contents load, but those lines are not starting from ambient, they are coming into a system which has already displaced due to thermal and weight loads. How to consider lines starting and shutting down within an operational system that has already displaced?

    Same with shutdown. Removal of thermal and pressure load starts from a displaced position, not ambient starting point

  7. rahul lad
    ― May 22, 2014 - 1:35 pm  Reply

    Can any one tell me for checking occasional load cases, which temperature to be considered. Max. Design temperature or Operating. And is it compulsory that vales which we put in T1 and P1 in Caesar should be max. of all values.

    1. want2learn
      ― May 23, 2014 - 3:55 pm  Reply

      It will be informed by the client of the project. Normally operating temperature is considered along with occasional loads.

  8. nilesh
    ― August 17, 2014 - 9:50 pm  Reply

    Its very broadly explained.and got lots knowledge

  9. nilesh
    ― August 17, 2014 - 9:54 pm  Reply

    I wanna know the basics of analysis??..can anybody explain well..plz

    1. GGN
      ― August 3, 2015 - 7:11 pm  Reply

      hi buddy

  10. Esie
    ― October 3, 2014 - 12:22 am  Reply

    I have read some just right stuff here. Definitely value bookmarking
    for revisiting. I surprise how so much attempt you set to make this kind of magnificent
    informative website.

  11. Anirban Datta
    ― December 12, 2014 - 12:53 pm  Reply

    Requesting you to check the load cases 10 & 12 and 11 & 13. Probably there may be some typographical error.

    1. want2learn
      ― December 12, 2014 - 2:50 pm  Reply

      Thanks Anirban. The error is updated.

  12. akshay
    ― April 8, 2015 - 10:19 pm  Reply

    one of the best blog i have ever visited .

  13. Ronald
    ― April 23, 2015 - 1:52 am  Reply

    Excellent post, but i have a question, what happen with seismic from Y directions??

    1. Ray
      ― August 18, 2015 - 11:06 am  Reply

      Add U3 for Y direction.
      10.W+T1+P1+U1 OPE Considering seismic from +X direction
      11. W+T1+P1-U1 OPE Considering seismic from -X direction
      12 W+T1+P1+U2 OPE Considering seismic from +Z direction
      13 W+T1+P1-U2 OPE Considering seismic from -Z direction

    2. Ray
      ― August 18, 2015 - 11:09 am  Reply

      Add U3 in load case as following,
      10. W+T1+P1+U1 OPE Considering seismic from +X direction
      11. W+T1+P1-U1 OPE Considering seismic from -X direction
      12 W+T1+P1+U2 OPE Considering seismic from +Z direction
      13 W+T1+P1-U2 OPE Considering seismic from -Z direction
      14. W+T1+P1+U3 OPE Considering seismic from +Y direction
      15. W+T1+P1-U3 OPE Considering seismic from -Y direction

  14. opinion1055
    ― August 3, 2015 - 7:24 pm  Reply

    Dear,
    I have a doubt :
    “Load case 33. L3-L4 EXP for complete stress range”
    EXP for complete stress range is L2-L4 right ?
    plz confirm

    1. want2learn
      ― August 3, 2015 - 7:32 pm  Reply

      L3-L4 is complete stress range for the mentioned load cases. It has to be max design temp-min design temp. Here T2 is max temp.

      1. opinion1055
        ― August 4, 2015 - 11:27 am  Reply

        OOh… I’m sorry .. Yes you are right… I didnt read the temperature description properly.

  15. Ray
    ― August 18, 2015 - 11:26 am  Reply

    What if both seismic and displacement (thermal displacement & tank settlement) are required to add in load case, how I should add for displacement?
    Should I add D1(thermal displacement) & D3 (tank settlement) together with U1 & U2 ?

  16. Surekha Satpute
    ― January 7, 2016 - 12:05 pm  Reply

    Keep up the good work. This is very informative. Thanks for sharing. I am keen learner of stress analysis as I m a piping engineer. Nowadays I m regularly following your posts. Thanks again.

  17. kurnoy
    ― April 28, 2016 - 10:55 am  Reply

    Hi want2learn,

    Since this is a typical must have cases, it would be better if hangers already be considered. I think CAESAR would run it even if the model does not have hangers.

  18. kurnoy
    ― April 28, 2016 - 11:03 am  Reply

    Since this is a typical must have cases, it would be better if spring hangers (HGR) already be considered . I think CAESAR would run it even if the model does not have hangers.

  19. Piping Utilities
    ― October 16, 2017 - 10:24 am  Reply

    Check the thrust force calculation here.
    https://sites.google.com/view/pipingutilities

  20. chaitanya
    ― November 19, 2017 - 9:58 pm  Reply

    Hiii…..
    Can we use T1 as a (delta T) temp difference between max temp and min temp in cyclic case & then for full EXP case- L2-L5 ???

    Thanks in advance.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Search this Website

Subscribe For Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Most Popular posts

  • Pressure Tests of Piping systems-Hydrotest Vs Pneumatic Test
  • 11 most important questions & answers from ASME B 31.3 which a Piping stress engineer must know
  • BASICS OF PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS: A PRESENTATION-Part 1 of 2
  • Piping Elbows and Bends: A useful detailed literature for piping engineers
  • Step by Step Methods for WRC 107 and WRC 297 Checking in Caesar II
  • BALL VALVE DESIGN FEATURES: A Literature-Part-3 of 4
  • A brief presentation on Air Cooled Heat Exchangers
  • Top 12 must have Piping books for a begineer into Piping industry
  • Stress Analysis of PSV connected Piping systems using Caesar II
  • Must have Load cases for stress analysis of a typical piping system using Caesar II

Previous Posts

Select Category of Interest

Sitemap

SiteMap