• Home
  • About us
  • Piping Stress
    • Caesar II
    • Codes & Standards
    • Static Analysis
    • Piping Supports
    • Spring Hanger
  • Piping Design
    • Piping Layout
    • Piping Materials
  • Piping Jobs
  • Misc.
    • Civil
    • Instrumentation
    • process
    • Frequently Asked Interview Questions
    • Forum
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

What is Piping

An attempt to explain process piping engineering basics in detail to help all the process piping engineering professionals around the world.

Menu
  • Home
  • About us
  • Piping Stress
    • Caesar II
    • Codes & Standards
    • Static Analysis
    • Piping Supports
    • Spring Hanger
  • Piping Design
    • Piping Layout
    • Piping Materials
  • Piping Jobs
  • Misc.
    • Civil
    • Instrumentation
    • process
    • Frequently Asked Interview Questions
    • Forum
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
 › Caesar II › Piping guides › piping stress › piping stress analysis › static analysis › static equipment › stress analysis › Stress Critical Lines › Uncategorized › WRC › WRC 107 › WRC 297 › Stress Analysis of Column piping system using Caesar II

Stress Analysis of Column piping system using Caesar II

want2learn March 1, 2018     18 Comments    

LinkedIn0
Facebook0
Google+4
Pinterest0
Twitter0

Columns or Towers, used for distilling raw materials (Crude Oils) are very important equipments in any process industry . Every process piping industry must have several columns. Lines of various diameter and properties (Process Parameters) are connected to Columns at different elevations. Stress analysis of all large bore lines connected to column are required to assess proper supporting and nozzle loading. Looking to the construction of column, it has number of trays at different elevation. Temperature at each tray location differs based on process.
In the following article I will try to explain the methodology followed for stress analysis of Column Piping using Caesar II.

Stress analysis of Column Piping will be discussed in following points:  1. Inputs required for analysis  2.  Temperature profile creation for the column/tower 3. Modelling in Caesar II 4. Supporting of Column Connected piping system and 5. Nozzle load qualification.

1. Inputs required for Analysis: The following data are required while modeling and analysing column connected lines:

a) Column G.A.drawing with all dimensions, nozzle orientation, materials etc.
b) Column temperature profile.
c) Line Designation Table/ Line list/Line Parameters and P&ID.
d) Column line ISO.
e) Allowable nozzle load table as specified in Project Specification.

2. Temperature profile for Column/Tower: Different organization uses different methods for creating column temperature profile. Here I will describe two methods which are most widely used.

Temperature profiles for towers are normally created based on connected outlet lines. So in the P&ID mark the big size (big size means nozzle size which will make consideration impact in temperature change) column outlet nozzles. Then write down the operating and design temperatures beside those lines from line list. Lets assume that there are three big size (N1, N2 and N3 as shown in Fig. 1) outlet nozzles in a typical tower. So temperature profile for that column can be created as shown in Fig. 1. This method is the most widely used method among prevailing EPC industries.

Temperature Profile of Column

 

Fig. 1: Temperature profile creation for a typical tower- Method 1

Again the temperature profile of the above tower can be generated using the method mentioned in Fig. 2. Many of the organizations use this method too.

Column Piping

 

Fig. 2: Temperature profile Creation for a typical Column -Method 2

Few organisation uses the operating and design temperatures mentioned in equipment GA as the equipment operating and design temperature. However the above two methods mentioned will result in thermal growth close to reality.

3. Modeling the Column/Tower in Caesar II:  All equipment modeling are almost similar. Start modeling the tower from the skirt and go up or start from nozzle of interest and go down till skirt as per your choice. It is a better practice to use node number such a way that the equipment nodes can easily be separated from the piping nodes. I personally model equipments starting from node 5000.  Lets start from a typical nozzle flange. So model 5000-5020 as nozzle flange with nozzle diameter and thickness as mentioned in equipment GA drawing. Sometimes vendor GA may not be available (during initial phase of the project), so in such situation use engineering drawing as the basis for modeling. Normally mechanical departments have minimum nozzle thickness chart based on flange rating and corrosion allowance. Take nozzle thickness from that chart or otherwise assume nozzle thickness as two size higher than the connected pipe thickness. Use temperatures as mentioned in the above two diagrams (Fig. 1 or Fig. 2) from flange onwards, pressure, corrosion allowance, materials, insulation thickness and density etc as mentioned in reference equipment drawing. Then model 5020 to 10 as pipe element with length from reference drawing (Normally nozzle projection from equipment centreline in provided, in that case calculate the nozzle length by subtracting the equipment outside radius and flange length already modelled). Provide Anchor at node 10 with Cnode at 5040. Providing node number for nozzles as 10, 20 etc will put all this nodes at initial nodes in restraint summary which helps me in checking nozzle loads very quickly. You can provide separate nodes if you wish. This completes the nozzle model. Now we will model the equipment.

Model 5040 to 5060 as rigid body with zero weight with length=half of equipment OD, material as provided in reference drawing, temperature as mentioned the above figures, pressure and other parameters from reference equipment drawing. This element will take you to the center of the equipment. From this part onwards simply model the equipment as pipe elements taking temperature profile as mentioned in the above figures. Check diameter and thickness in reference drawing as those values sometimes changes as you proceed from top towards skirt. Finally model the skirt as pipe element with temperatures calculated as mention at the last paragraph of this topic and pressures, fluid density, corrosion allowance as zero. Provide fixed anchor at bottom of skirt. Refer Fig. 3 for a sample model of column. Different colors are for different temperatures.

 Column Piping

 

Fig. 3: A simple model of a Tower in Caesar II

4. Supporting of Column Connected Piping System: The pipes are normally supported from column itself. This type of supports are called cleat supports or clip supports. The first support from column nozzle is a load taking support which carries the total vertical load of the pipe. Try to place this load taking support as near to the nozzle as possible. Rest all are guide supports. As the clips are connected to the tower body we have to model clips from column and connect the supports with a Cnode to take the thermal effect of that location. The load bearing capacity of the clip supports are normally standardized by support standard. So sometimes it may appear that the load at first load taking support is exceeding the clip load bearing capability (This could happen if a very large size line is connected towards the top of the column, overhead lines) . In those cases we have to take 2nd support from nozzle as a load taking support as well. This support has to be a Spring hanger support which will share part of the load of the first load taking support. From that point onwards guide supports will be used based on standard guide span as specified in project specification. A sample Caesar II model is shown in Fig 4 for your reference to explain the clip supports. Model the clip as rigid body with zero weight with equipment properties when inside equipment and with ambient temperature when outside equipment.

Tower Piping

Fig. 4: Caesar II model showing Clip/Cleat Supporting

5. Nozzle Load Qualification: Allowable nozzle loads are normally provided by equipment vendor and mentioned in general arrangement drawing. Few organization has standard load table based on nozzle diameter and flange rating. So compare your calculated loads at nozzle anchor point with this allowabale values to find if calculated loads are acceptable or not. If loads are exceeding the allowable values modify the supporting or routing to reduce your nozzle loads. In some situation when routing change is not feasible perform WRC as mentioned in one of my last articles or perform FEA (Nozzle Pro) to check whether generated stresses are acceptable. In extreme cases send your nozzle loads to vendor for their acceptance.

Skirt Temperature Calculation:

Calculate skirt temperature following the given equation:

Average Skirt Temperature=(T-Ta)*F+ Ta; in degree centigrade

Here Ta=Ambient Temperature in degree Centigrade; T=Temperature at the top of the skirt; F=[83.6/{(K*h/t^0.5)+15.5}]; K=insulation constant=1.0 for fire brick insulation=1.6 for non insulated; h and t are skirt height and thickness respectively.

If you have any confusion please inform in comments section.

Related posts:

  1. Step by Step Methods for WRC 107 and WRC 297 Checking in Caesar II
  2. Static Method of Seismic Analysis of Piping System using Caesar II
  3. Methods for flange leakage checking by Pressure Equivalent Method using Caesar II
  4. Stress Analysis of Pump Piping (Centrifugal) System using Caesar II
  5. Static Method of Wind Analysis of Piping systems in Caesar II using Pressure Vs elevation Method
  6. Underground Piping Stress Analysis Procedure using Caesar II
  7. Stress Analysis of GRP / GRE / FRP piping system using Caesar II: Part 2 of 2
Caesar II Piping guides piping stress piping stress analysis static analysis static equipment stress analysis Stress Critical Lines Uncategorized WRC WRC 107 WRC 297
Column Pipingload casesstatic analysisStress Analysisvertical column

 Previous Post

A short presentation on Pressure and Pressure Measuring Instruments: Part 1 of 2

― February 28, 2018

Next Post 

Procedure for opening a Caesar II file version 8.0 into its lower version Caesar II Version 7.0

― March 1, 2018

Author: want2learn

Related Articles

Showing North Direction and Support TAG

want2learn ― April 2, 2018 | No Comment

Added Features of CAESAR II 2018, Version 10.00

Finally I got the scope to use the latest version of Caesar II 2018 version 10.00 which was released by

want2learn ― March 30, 2018 | 5 Comments

Points to consider while checking a stress system using Caesar II

want2learn ― March 18, 2018 | No Comment

BASICS OF PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS: A PRESENTATION-Part 2 of 2

want2learn ― March 11, 2018 | 4 Comments

Static Method of Wind Analysis of Piping systems in Caesar II using Pressure Vs elevation Method

want2learn ― March 6, 2018 | 1 Comment

Stress Analysis of Vertical Reboiler Piping using Caesar II: Part 3 of 3

want2learn ― March 5, 2018 | 15 Comments

Stress Analysis of Pump Piping (Centrifugal) System using Caesar II

Anirban Datta ― March 3, 2018 | No Comment

ADVANTAGE OF USING ‘BLOCK OPERATION’ IN CAESAR II

want2learn ― February 25, 2018 | 5 Comments

Basics for Stress Analysis of Underground Piping using Caesar II

18 Comments

  1. Van Ha
    ― January 16, 2014 - 11:21 am  Reply

    Dear Sir,

    If we define temperature profile for column by following tray temperature profile of Process Data Sheet or GA drawing. Is it possible?

    1. Anup
      ― January 16, 2014 - 12:15 pm  Reply

      yes it is possible and that can be done too…

  2. Mehul
    ― January 16, 2014 - 8:02 pm  Reply

    Can we take same design temp throughout  column height as per GA or Mech datasheet and temperature profile for operating temp. only.

    1. Anup
      ― January 20, 2014 - 12:26 pm  Reply

      For both operating and design temperature it is better to create the temperature profile from connected lines.

      1. Sharad Patole
        ― February 5, 2015 - 2:27 pm  Reply

        calculation ragarding avarage temperaure profile of the skirt is given in the Kellogs book.

  3. Van Ha
    ― January 19, 2014 - 11:09 am  Reply

    Dear Sir,

    I have 2 more questions as below. I hope you can reply:

    #1:
    Do we need to set fluid density as “0” for long vertical pipe around column? because in case if we have very big size and heavy fluid density, it will effect to support load on EQP and spring size selection also. The fluid weight itself will not be carried by pipe support.

    #2:
    Is it ok to use your equation to calculate skirt temperature? How can I trust this equation?

    1. Anup
      ― January 20, 2014 - 12:30 pm  Reply

      1. In my opinion you have to take the fluid density for support load and spring selection as that fluid will always be there inside the pipe run.

      2. That equation for skirt temperature calculation is based on some code (mostly ASCE or UBC) and universally accepted. So you can use this equation.

  4. Asim Shamim
    ― February 7, 2014 - 12:03 am  Reply

    Dear Author,
    As far as I have conceived from the this is that equipment has been modeled as a Pipe. One of the demerits in such a method is that Caesar starts evaluating whole equipment which is not our objective.
    In my opinion, equipment should be modeled as a rigid element with zero weight, so that it does not get evaluated as per the specified code say B 31.3. 
    Waiting for a response from your side on my query.

  5. Somnath
    ― March 6, 2014 - 2:35 pm  Reply

    What are the units for “h” & “t” in skirt temp. calculation formula.

  6. Tan
    ― March 11, 2014 - 12:17 am  Reply

    F=[83.6/{(K*h/t^0.5)+15.5}]
    What are the units for “h” & “t” in skirt temp. calculation formula.
    What are the units for “F” ?

  7. nishit
    ― April 2, 2014 - 11:51 pm  Reply

    Sir,

    how do we consider start up and shut down cases of column with connected piping

  8. NASEEM AHMAD
    ― April 3, 2014 - 11:45 am  Reply

    Dear sir
    can you provide me information on how to do modelling in CAESARII.

  9. IRFANALI
    ― April 14, 2014 - 4:31 pm  Reply

    Dear Anup,

    Can you provide the analysis of air fin cooler?

  10. Dinesh Koranga
    ― October 11, 2014 - 1:30 pm  Reply

    Dear Sir,

    Request you if you can help on explaining what is the sway effect on column line?

    How it is incorporated in Column line analysis?
      
    Do we model Column as rigid element and then input the wind displacement at different elevations?

  11. Ari
    ― December 23, 2015 - 8:49 pm  Reply

    Hi every body
    Could you please, explain clearly, what is the procedure of modeling vessel clips?
    For example which nodes shall be CNode?
    It would be very useful if you issue an example please.
    Thank you in Advance

  12. Sodsai.L
    ― March 5, 2016 - 1:56 pm  Reply

    Ari,

    modeling => connect node from center of vessel (node 1) to location as vessel clip attached (node 2), length = D_vessel/2, all property & temp. & pressure profile same as vessel, rigid weight = 0.
    => connect node from location as vessel clip attached (node 2) to location as pipe need supported (node 3), temp ambient, pressure =0, insulation thickness=0, fluid density =0, mat’l property same as vessel, rigid weight =0.
    => add restraint on pipe then CNODE as end of vessel clips (node 3)

  13. Adarsha
    ― August 28, 2016 - 9:31 am  Reply

    Thank you Anup Sir, for this very useful article.
    I was needed same clarification as by Ari, Thank you Sodsai.L.

  14. kumar4cad
    ― March 3, 2017 - 10:43 pm  Reply

    Viewer, Don’t go with a benchmark of a stress analysis theory. very baby is different as you see. In above model there is big mistake to correct, never clip the first support on the pipe rack as shown in this case. also never come to conclusion with one model like this. you have to do three type of stress analysis one for pressure vessel profile, one for piping tie-in on the top without attaching pressure vessel pipe supports, one for piping with tie-in connection and pipe supports attached to vertical pressure vessel.

    Three analysis you will notice a big difference of thermal stress, piping loads and nozzle loads, if pressure vessel thermal displacement is more then 6inch and loads on the support are more then 30,000lb go for constant supports.

    Understand the fundamental of how stress is acting with different load cases and process condition, NEVER believe with benchmarks.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Search this Website

Subscribe For Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Most Popular posts

  • Pressure Tests of Piping systems-Hydrotest Vs Pneumatic Test
  • 11 most important questions & answers from ASME B 31.3 which a Piping stress engineer must know
  • BASICS OF PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS: A PRESENTATION-Part 1 of 2
  • Piping Elbows and Bends: A useful detailed literature for piping engineers
  • Step by Step Methods for WRC 107 and WRC 297 Checking in Caesar II
  • BALL VALVE DESIGN FEATURES: A Literature-Part-3 of 4
  • A brief presentation on Air Cooled Heat Exchangers
  • Top 12 must have Piping books for a begineer into Piping industry
  • Stress Analysis of PSV connected Piping systems using Caesar II
  • Must have Load cases for stress analysis of a typical piping system using Caesar II

Previous Posts

Select Category of Interest

Sitemap

SiteMap