• Home
  • About us
  • Piping Stress
    • Caesar II
    • Codes & Standards
    • Static Analysis
    • Piping Supports
    • Spring Hanger
  • Piping Design
    • Piping Layout
    • Piping Materials
  • Piping Jobs
  • Misc.
    • Civil
    • Instrumentation
    • process
    • Frequently Asked Interview Questions
    • Forum
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

What is Piping

An attempt to explain process piping engineering basics in detail to help all the process piping engineering professionals around the world.

Menu
  • Home
  • About us
  • Piping Stress
    • Caesar II
    • Codes & Standards
    • Static Analysis
    • Piping Supports
    • Spring Hanger
  • Piping Design
    • Piping Layout
    • Piping Materials
  • Piping Jobs
  • Misc.
    • Civil
    • Instrumentation
    • process
    • Frequently Asked Interview Questions
    • Forum
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
 › ANSI B 31.3 › ASME B 31.3 › B 31.3 › Caesar II › Detail Design › Flexibility Analysis › piping stress › piping stress analysis › static analysis › stress analysis › Uncategorized › BASICS OF PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS: A PRESENTATION-Part 1 of 2

BASICS OF PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS: A PRESENTATION-Part 1 of 2

want2learn February 26, 2018     2 Comments    

LinkedIn0
Facebook0
Google+0
Pinterest4
Twitter0

BASICS OF PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS: A PRESENTATION

Contents

  • Objectives of Pipe Stress Analysis
  • Governing Codes and Standards
  • Stresses in a Piping System
  • Reducing Piping Stresses
  • Basic Allowable Stress
  • Loads on a Piping System
  • Work Flow Diagram
  • Stress Criticality & Analysis Method
  • Piping Stress Analysis using Software Caesar II
  • Type of Supports
  • Questionnaire

Objectives of Pipe Stress Analysis:

Structural Integrity:

  • Design adequacy for the pressure of the carrying fluid.
  • Failure against various loading in the life cycle . Limiting stresses below code allowable.

Operational Integrity:

  • Limiting nozzle loads of the connected equipment within allowable values.
  • Avoiding leakage at joints.
  • Limiting sagging & displacement within allowable values.

Optimal Design:

  • Avoiding excessive flexibility and also high loads on supporting structures. Aim towards an optimal design for both piping and structure.

Governing Codes and Standards:

  • Codes and Standards specify minimum requirements for safe design and construction (i. e. provides material, design, fabrication, installation and inspection requirements.)
  • Following are the codes and standards used for Refinery Piping:
  1. ASME B31.3: Process piping Code
  2. ASME B31.1: Power Piping Code
  3. Centrifugal Pumps: API 610
  4. Positive Displacement Pumps: API 676
  5. Centrifugal Compressors: API 617
  6. Reciprocating Compressors: API 618
  7. Steam Turbines: NEMA SM23/ API 612
  8. Air Cooled Heat Exchanger: API 661
  9. Fired Heaters: API 560
  10. Flat Bottom Welded Storage Tanks: API 650
  11. Heat Exchangers: TEMA/ Vendor Specific.
  12. Vessel/Column: Vendor Specific

Stresses in a Piping System:

  • Sources for generation of stress in a Piping System:
  1. Weight
  2. Internal/External Pressure
  3. Temperature change
  4. Occasional Loads due to wind, seismic disturbances, PSV discharge etc.
  5. Forces due to Vibration.
  • Sustained Stresses are the stresses generated by sustained loads. (e.g. Pressure , Weight). These loads are present continuously throughout plant life.
  • Resistive force arising out of sustained stresses balance the external forces keeping the system in equilibrium. Exceeding sustain allowable stress value causes catastrophic failure of the system.
  • As per ASME B 31.3, (clause 302.3.5) “ The sum of the longitudinal stresses, SL, in any component in a piping system, due to sustained loads such as pressure and weight, shall not exceed the product Sh x W ”. Where, Sh=Basic allowable stress at maximum metal temperature expected during the displacement cycle and W=weld joint strength reduction factor.
  • Pressure Stresses are taken care of by calculating and selecting proper pipe thickness. The pressure thickness (t) of a straight pipe can be obtained as per ASME B31.3 from the equation (Clause 304.1.2) mentioned in Fig.1:
Equation for thickness calculation

Fig. 1: Equation for Thickness Calculation for Straight Pipe based on ASME B 31.3

  • Change in length of a pipe of length L due to temp change (ΔT) is given by ΔL=L α ΔT  Here, α =Co efficient of thermal expansion = change in length of unit length element due to unit change in temp.
  • Two “α” values in Code (Table C1 and C3 in ASME B31.3 Appendix C):
  • Table C1 denotes total linear thermal expansion between 700 F to Indicated temp (unit=in/100ft).
  • Table C3 denotes mean coefficient of linear thermal expansion between 700 F to indicated temp (μin/in/0F).
  • Expansion stresses are generated when the free thermal growth due to temperature change is restricted. These are self limiting or relenting.
  • SIF( Stress Intensification Factor): This is the ratio of the maximum stress intensity to the nominal Stress. SIF factors for different components can be obtained from Appendix D of ASME B31.3.
  • Displacement Stress Range due to thermal expansion is calculated based on equation SE = ( Sb^2+4 St^2)^0.5 per equation 17 from ASME B31.3( clause 319.4.4).
  • This SE value shall not exceed SA value where SA= Allowable Displacement Stress Range.
  • As per ASME code B 31.3 (Clause 302.3.5) the allowable displacement stress range (SA) can be given by the equation (Fig.2):

 

Equation for Displacement Stress Range Allowable

Fig.2: Equation for Displacement Stress Range Allowable

Here, f= Stress range reduction factor and Sc=basic allowable stress at minimum metal temp

  • When Sh > SL , the allowable stress range is calculated by the following equation (Fig. 3): SL=Longitudinal Stress due to sustained loads.

 

Equation for Liberal Displacement Stress Range Allowable

Fig.3: Equation for Liberal Displacement Stress Range Allowable

  • Occasional Stresses are generated by the occasional loads such as Wind, seismic, PSV discharge etc.
  • This loads act in a piping system for very small period of time, usually less than 10% of total working period.
  • As per ASME B31.3 clause 302.3.6 “The sum of the longitudinal stresses, SL, due to sustained loads, such as pressure and weight, and of the stresses produced by occasional loads, such as wind or earthquake should be ≤ 1.33 times the basic allowable stress, Sh”
  • Code does not explicitly explain the stresses generated due to vibration.
  • The vibration problems are solved by engineering judgment and experience.

Reducing Piping stresses:

  • Supports for Weight
  • Flexibility for thermal loading Eg. Expansion Loops.

Flexibility check (as per clause 319.4.1, ASME B 31.3): Refer Fig. 4

Flexibility Check Equation for Simple Systems

Fig.4: Flexibility Check Equation for Simple Systems

 

 Click here to read Part 2 of this presentation

Related posts:

  1. Must have Load cases for stress analysis of a typical piping system using Caesar II
  2. Static Method of Seismic Analysis of Piping System using Caesar II
  3. BASICS OF PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS: A PRESENTATION-Part 2 of 2
  4. Static Method of Wind Analysis of Piping systems in Caesar II using Pressure Vs elevation Method
  5. Piping Stress Engineer required for Philadelphia (Experience: 5 yrs+)
  6. Stress Analysis of Jacketed Piping System using Caesar II
  7. Enriched features of Caesar II-2016 (Version 8.0)
ANSI B 31.3 ASME B 31.3 B 31.3 Caesar II Detail Design Flexibility Analysis piping stress piping stress analysis static analysis stress analysis Uncategorized
basics of pipe stressFlexibility Analysispipe stress analysis basicsPiping Stress

 Previous Post

Common Non Ferrous Materials used in Process Piping Industry

― February 25, 2018

Next Post 

A brief presentation on “DEHYDRATION : AN OVERVIEW”

― February 26, 2018

Author: want2learn

Related Articles

want2learn ― March 26, 2018 | 3 Comments

Stress Analysis of Centrifugal Compressor Connected Piping Systems using Caesar II: Part 1

Introduction: Centrifugal compressors are considered to be one of the most critical equipments in the piping industry. For increasing the

want2learn ― March 19, 2018 | 14 Comments

Co-Efficient of Friction for pipe supporting during Stress Analysis using Caesar II

want2learn ― March 19, 2018 | 2 Comments

Slug Flow Analysis Using Dynamic Spectrum Method in Caesar II Part 1 of 2

want2learn ― March 18, 2018 | No Comment

BASICS OF PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS: A PRESENTATION-Part 2 of 2

want2learn ― March 7, 2018 | 5 Comments

Case Study for Fatigue Analysis in Caesar II for a typical piping system

want2learn ― March 6, 2018 | 1 Comment

Stress Analysis of Vertical Reboiler Piping using Caesar II: Part 3 of 3

Anirban Datta ― March 3, 2018 | No Comment

ADVANTAGE OF USING ‘BLOCK OPERATION’ IN CAESAR II

want2learn ― March 1, 2018 | 2 Comments

Procedure for opening a Caesar II file version 8.0 into its lower version Caesar II Version 7.0

2 Comments

  1. Valery Anpilov
    ― January 23, 2015 - 12:22 pm  Reply

    My proposals for the calculations on the strength of pipelines, tanks and pressure vessels.

    Calculation of the overall stress-strain state of piping systems made from both metal and non-metal (including composites) materials, for given values of temperature, pressure, weight of the internal environment, self-weight of the structure, taking into account the kinematic conditions, as well as the friction in the bearings.
    Calculation of the strength of the joints, bends, tees, valves elements of pipeline systems involving 3D-geometric and finite element modeling.
    Determination of displacements and stresses in the individual fragments of the pipeline circuit different geometry in the presence of poles at a given temperature, pressure, weight of the internal environment on the basis of three-dimensional modeling of cladding and finite elements.
    The calculation of the strength of the underground part of the pipeline at a given temperature and pressure of the internal environment, taking into account not elastic properties of the soil (model Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, Cam-Clay, Cap-model), the depth of the pipe, soil temperature, pipe friction on the ground.
    Determination of pipes, joints, fittings elements with hydraulic shock.
    Estimation of seismic stability of pipeline systems as a whole, as well as separate areas and support units.
    Calculation of the total strength of the static pressure vessels and tanks made of metal and nonmetal (including composite) materials.
    Evaluation of durability and service life of pressure vessels and tanks under cyclic variation of the parameters of internal and / or external environment.
    Seismic resistance of tanks and pressure vessels, including partially filled with liquid – allowance for the interaction design with a liquid using “technology” – coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) analyses.
    Determination hydrodynamic loads “facilities” of fluid flow.

  2. want2learn
    ― February 12, 2015 - 9:10 pm  Reply

    Few nice points has been discussed on this post in linkedin page. Follow this link to access those: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/http-wwwwhatispipingcom-basicsofpipestressanalysis-59422.S.5970562625166127107?view=&item=5970562625166127107&type=member&gid=59422&trk=eml-group_discussion_new_comment-discussion-title-link&midToken=AQH3kT0n6EEJKA&fromEmail=fromEmail&ut=0OXgM9Rbpz56E1.

    However for the convenience of my readers i am reproducing those here.

    By Mr Rao: 
    Consultant at DOW chemicals int.pvt.Ltd.
    Dear Anup, I have one question ? 
    In ceaser analysis all supports are considered as point contact which is not true practically. 
    How does this facilitae accuracy with the effect of friction factor when we are working with srface contact for supports resting flat..

    By Anup Kumar Dey:
    Sir, In my opinion The point contact and surface contact does not affect the friction factor. Only surface roughness of the contact point does. As for example if the contact is between CS to CS the friction factor is normally 0.3 or 0.4. It does not reduce when used as point contact. But if we can make the surface polished then the same will reduce.

    By Mr. SATISH KUMAR
    Package Design Engineer at Fichtner Consulting Engineers India P Ltd.
    Sir, horizontal force applied will be friction factor * normal reaction force.this horizontal force will be applied against movement of pipe axis.hence place of this force will be different.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Search this Website

Subscribe For Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Most Popular posts

  • Pressure Tests of Piping systems-Hydrotest Vs Pneumatic Test
  • 11 most important questions & answers from ASME B 31.3 which a Piping stress engineer must know
  • BASICS OF PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS: A PRESENTATION-Part 1 of 2
  • Piping Elbows and Bends: A useful detailed literature for piping engineers
  • Step by Step Methods for WRC 107 and WRC 297 Checking in Caesar II
  • BALL VALVE DESIGN FEATURES: A Literature-Part-3 of 4
  • A brief presentation on Air Cooled Heat Exchangers
  • Top 12 must have Piping books for a begineer into Piping industry
  • Stress Analysis of PSV connected Piping systems using Caesar II
  • Must have Load cases for stress analysis of a typical piping system using Caesar II

Previous Posts

Select Category of Interest

Sitemap

SiteMap